ABSTRACT
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) caused by decreased activity of a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13 (ADAMTS13). Platelet-rich thrombi in small vessels lead to fragmentation of RBCs causing microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA). Therapeutic plasma exchange is life-saving and is the mainstay of the treatment of TTP. Higher dose IV steroids along with rituximab are used as an adjunct to plasma exchange. Our case report describes a 26-year-old healthy male who presented with new onset seizures and encephalopathy. Blood work demonstrated anemia, severe thrombocytopenia, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, decreased haptoglobin, and elevated creatinine, and peripheral blood smear showed marked schistocytosis indicating MAHA. Plasma exchange and high-dose steroids were started on a presumptive diagnosis of TTP. ADAMTS13 activity was undetectable and ADAMTS13 inhibitor levels were elevated. Rituximab and caplacizumab were then added. Symptoms of encephalopathy improved by day five and platelet counts started improving by day nine. After several days of plasma exchange, he showed a “clinical response” with several weeks of active treatment. The association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and the severity of TTP with multiorgan failure is not well understood yet. Although we describe a successful multimodal approach to the management of TTP, which we believe is secondary to COVID-19 infection, further research is warranted to analyze and understand the pathophysiology by which COVID-19 infection causes TTP. It would help in establishing standardized therapy in the future.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During the year 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic spread from China to the rest of the world, which prompted the world to implement a widespread mandated quarantine or social isolation. The impending uncertainty of the pandemic must have resulted in a variety of widespread mental health maladies. There has been documentation in the literature about a lot of these in small populations of the world but limited studies have been conducted in India, leading to limited evidence in the literature. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of our study is to investigate the mental health effects that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on the general population in India both quantitatively and qualitatively. These results will help contribute to reducing the knowledge gap that is recognized in the literature, which is the result of the unprecedented and novel nature of the pandemic. METHODS: We designed and validated our own questionnaire and used the method of circulating the questionnaire via WhatsApp (Facebook Inc). WhatsApp is a social media app that is very popularly used in India; hence, it turned out to be an effective medium for gathering pilot data. We analyzed the pilot data and used them to validate the questionnaire. This was done with the expertise of our mentor, Nilima Shah, MD (psychiatry). We gathered pilot data on 545 subjects and used the results to determine the changes that were needed for the questionnaire while simultaneously validating the questionnaire. RESULTS: The study protocol was approved in September 2020 by the institutional review board at Vadilal Sarabhai General Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. CONCLUSIONS: The following preliminary assumptions can be made about the study based on the pilot data: the majority of the survey respondents were male (289/545, 53%), most of them were educated and employed as health care workers (199/545, 36.5%). The majority of the responders were self-employed (185/545, 33.9%), single (297/545, 54.5%), and stayed with their families (427/541, 79%) for the lockdown, which helped them psychologically. Findings that are specific to mental health have been elaborated upon in the manuscript. It is evident from the data collected in previous literature that the pandemic has had significant detrimental effects on the mental health of a vast proportion of the Indian population. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/29896.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic began in late December in 2019 and has now reached to 216 countries with 1,08,42,028 confirmed cases and 5,21,277 deaths according to the WHO reports and 6,49,666 confirmed cases in india alone with 18,679 deaths (as on 04th july 2020). RT-PCR has been considered the standard test for diagnosis of COVID 19. However, there has been reported a high false negative rate. This high false negative rate increases the risk of further transmission as well as delays the timely management of suspected cases. We have conducted HRCT chest of various (200 patient case study) proven and suspected cases of COVID-19 infection in the months of April, May and June 2020. Out of 200 scanned patients with clinical complains and suspicion, positive HRCT chest findings were seen in 196 patients, showing clinical-radiological correlation and an accuracy of 98%. The sensitivity of chest CT in suggesting COVID-19 was 98.6% (146/148patients) based on positive RT-PCR results. In patients with negative RT-PCR results and high clinical suspicion, 90% (18/20) had positive chest CT findings. HRCT chest is very sensitive and accurate in picking up lung parenchymal abnormalities in laboratory negative RT-PCR cases with high clinical suspicion of COVID-19 infection and also in all symptomatic patients where RT-PCR was not done. HRCT can also be very sensitive, cost effective and time effective in screening patients with high clinical suspicion. HRCT scores over RT-PCR in giving immediate results, assessing severity of disease and prediction of prognosis. We suggest HRCT chest for detection of early parenchymal abnormalities, assessing severity of disease in all patients with clinical symptoms and suspicion of COVID infection irrespective of laboratory RT-PCR status.